1. 51.
    +1
    @53 inci diyelim.
    ···
  2. 52.
    +1
    @53 ben tabii ki
    ···
  3. 53.
    +1
    bana niye cevap vermiyosun. :p soru :p
    ···
  4. 54.
    +1
    Lan bin ettiniz başlıgı ben okuyodum aq ya..
    ···
  5. 55.
    +1
    @58 cok konusma seni de pic ederiz
    ···
  6. 56.
    +1
    beyler gecenlerde yolda yururken karsima bir kiz cikti
    boyle gotu guzel filan gogusler double diii
    neyse islik filan caldim arkadasindan
    dondu bana ve opucuk atti
    ···
  7. 57.
    +2
    The first artificial satellite was Sputnik 1, launched by the Soviet Union on October 4 1957, and initiating the Soviet Sputnik program, with Sergei Korolev as chief designer. This in turn triggered the Space Race between the Soviet Union and the United States.

    Sputnik 1 helped to identify the density of high atmospheric layers through measurement of its orbital change and provided data on radio-signal distribution in the ionosphere. The unanticipated announcement of Sputnik 1's success precipitated the Sputnik crisis in the United States and ignited the so-called Space Race within the Cold War.

    Sputnik 2 was launched on November 3, 1957 and carried the first living passenger into orbit, a dog named Laika.[4]

    In May, 1946, Project RAND had released the Preliminary Design of a Experimental World-Circling Spaceship, which stated, "A satellite vehicle with appropriate instrumentation can be expected to be one of the most potent scientific tools of the Twentieth Century.[5] The United States had been considering launching orbital satellites since 1945 under the Bureau of Aeronautics of the United States Navy. The United States Air Force's Project RAND eventually released the above report, but did not believe that the satellite was a potential military weapon; rather, they considered it to be a tool for science, politics, and propaganda. In 1954, the Secretary of Defense stated, "I know of no American satellite program."[6]

    On July 29, 1955, the White House announced that the U.S. intended to launch satellites by the spring of 1958. This became known as Project Vanguard. On July 31, the Soviets announced that they intended to launch a satellite by the fall of 1957.

    Following pressure by the American Rocket Society, the National Science Foundation, and the International Geophysical Year, military interest picked up and in early 1955 the Air Force and Navy were working on Project Orbiter, which involved using a Jupiter C rocket to launch a satellite. The project succeeded, and Explorer 1 became the United States' first satellite on January 31, 1958.[7]

    In June 1961, three-and-a-half years after the launch of Sputnik 1, the Air Force used resources of the United States Space Surveillance Network to catalog 115 Earth-orbiting satellites.[8]

    The largest artificial satellite currently orbiting the Earth is the International Space Station.
    ···
  8. 58.
    +1
    @54 inci geçenlerde olan bitene duyuru atmıştı zaten, reklamlardan gelen parayla bizim alakamız yok.
    ···
  9. 59.
    +1
    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz
    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz

    bu basligi pic ediyoruz
    ···
  10. 60.
    +1
    When a man has achieved a sufficient level of stimulation, ejaculation begins. At that point, under the control of the parasympathetic nervous system, semen containing sperm is produced. The semen is ejected through the urethra with rhythmic contractions.[3] These rhythmic contractions are part of the male orgasm. They are generated by the bulbospongiosus muscle under the control of a spinal reflex at the level of the spinal nerves S2-4 via the pudendal nerve. The typical male orgasm lasts several seconds.

    After the start of orgasm, pulses of semen begin to flow from the urethra, reach a peak discharge and then diminish in flow. The typical orgasm consists of 10 to 15 contractions, although the man is unlikely to be consciously aware of that many. Once the first contraction has taken place, ejaculation will continue to completion as an involuntary process. At this stage, ejaculation cannot be stopped. The rate of contractions gradually slows during the orgasm. Initial contractions occur at an average interval of 0.6 seconds with an increasing increment of 0.1 seconds per contraction. Contractions of most men proceed at regular rhythmic intervals for the duration of the orgasm. Many men also experience additional irregular contractions at the conclusion of the orgasm.[4]

    Ejaculation begins during the first or second contraction of orgasm. For most men the first spurt occurs during the second contraction. The first or second spurt is typically the largest and can contain 40 percent or more of the total ejaculate volume. After this peak the flow of each pulse diminishes. When the flow ends, the muscle contractions of the orgasm continue with no additional semen discharge. A small sample study of seven men showed an average of 7 spurts of semen (range between 5 and 10) followed by an average of 10 more contractions with no semen expelled (range between 5 and 23). This study also found a high correlation between number of spurts of semen and total ejaculate volume, i.e, larger semen volumes resulted from additional pulses of semen rather than larger individual spurts.[5] Men who volunteer for such studies might be proud of their orgasms and therefore have disproportionately more robust orgasms than the average.

    Alfred Kinsey measured the distance of ejaculation, in "some hundred" of men. In three-quarters of men, the semen exuded of the penis, "In other males the semen may be propelled from a matter of some inches to foot or two, or even as far as five or six (rarely eight) feet".[6] Masters and Johnson report ejaculation distance to be not greater than 30–60 cm.[7]. Distance of ejaculation however, has nothing to do with sexual functioning, as during penetration of penis in vagina the distance of ejaculation plays no role. Dribbling of semen from the penis is usually sufficient for impregnation.
    Tümünü Göster
    ···
  11. 61.
    +1
    The term gay was originally used, until well into the mid-20th century, primarily to refer to feelings of being "carefree", "happy", or "bright and showy"; it had also come to acquire some connotations of "immorality" as early as 1637.

    The term later began to be used in reference to homosexuality, in particular, from the early 20th century, a usage that may have dated prior to the 19th century.[1] In modern English, gay has come to be used as an adjective, and occasionally as a noun, that refers to the people, practices, and culture associated with homosexuality. By the end of the 20th century the word gay was recommended by major style guides to describe people attracted to members of the same sex.[2][3] At about the same time, a new, pejorative use became prevalent in some parts of the world. In the Anglosphere, this connotation, among younger generations of speakers, has a derisive meaning equivalent to rubbish or stupid (as in "That's so gay."). In this use the word does not mean "homosexual", so that it can be used, for example, of an inanimate object or abstract concept of which one disapproves, but the extent to which it still retains connotations of homosexuality has been debated
    ···
  12. 62.
    +1
    @66 mecbur kalmam, giymem, yakışır, verirler.
    ···
  13. 63.
    +1
    Other slang terms for she-male that emerged from sex work include tranny and ladyboy as well as a number of rhyming slang terms, including chicks with dicks, sluts with nuts, and dolls with balls.[12]

    The terms gynandromorph and gynemimetomorph have been proposed as technical terms for trans women.[13] A gynandromorph is an organism that contains both male and female characteristics. Gynandromorphy is a term of Greek etymology which means to have some of the body morphology and measurements of both an average woman and man.[14] Gynemimesis or gynemimism have been used to describe the adoption of female characteristics by a male.[15]

    Some mental health researchers consider attraction to transgender people to be a paraphilia. Sexologists John Money and Margaret Lamacz coined the term gynemimetophilia.[16] Psychologist Ray Blanchard and psychiatrist Peter Collins coined the term gynandromorphophilia.[8] Sociologist Richard Ekins writes that this attraction can include both identification and object choice in "fantasy femaling" masturbatory scripts.[17] Blanchard has proposed that this is "partial autogynephilia."[18] Psychiatrist Vernon Rosario has called labels like these "scientifically reifying" when applied to those attracted trans women.[19]

    As an alternative to a paraphilic model, sexologists Martin S. Weinberg and Colin J. Williams have used the term Men Sexually Interested in Transwomen (MSTW).[1] Slang terms for individuals with such preferences include transfans, tranny chasers and admirers.
    ···
  14. 64.
    +1
    In 1979, Janice Raymond employed the term as a derogatory descriptor for transsexual people in her controversial book, The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male.[29] Raymond and other cultural feminists like Mary Daly argue that a "she-male" or "male-to-constructed female" is still male and constitutes a patriarchal attack by males upon the female essence.[30] In some cultures it can also be used interchangeably with other terms referring to trans women.[citation needed]

    The term has since become an unflattering term applied to male-to-female transsexuals.[20] Psychologists Dana Finnegan and Emily Mcnally write that the term "tends to have demeaning connotations."[31] French professor John Phillips writes that shemale is "a linguistic oxymoron that simultaneously reflects but, by its very impossibility, challenges [gender] binary thinking, collapsing the divide between the masculine and the feminine."[12] Trans author Leslie Feinberg writes, "'he-she' and 'she-male' describe the person's gender expression with the first pronoun and the birth sex with the second. The hyphenation signals a crisis of language and an apparent social contradiction, since sex and gender are 'supposed' to match."[32] The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation has said the term is a "dehumanizing slur"[33] and should not be used "except in a direct quote that reveals the bias of the person quoted."[34]

    Some have adopted the term as a self-descriptor but this is often in context of sex work.[10][20][35] Transsexual author Kate Bornstein wrote that a friend who self-identified as "she-male" described herself as "tits, big hair, lots of make-up, and a dick."[36] Sex researchers Mildred Brown and Chloe Rounsley said, "She-males are men, often involved in prostitution, ferregraphy, or the adult entertainment business, who have undergone breast augmentation but have maintained their genitalia."[37] According to Professors Laura Castañeda and Shannon Campbell at the University of Southern California's Annenberg School of Journalism, "Using the term she-male for a transsexual woman would be considered highly offensive, for it implies that she is working 'in the [sex] trade.' It may be considered libelous."[38] Melissa Hope Ditmore, of the Trafficked Persons Rights Project, notes the term "is an invention of the sex industry, and most transwomen find the term abhorrent."[39] Biologist Julia Serano notes that it remains "derogatory or sensationalistic."[40] According to sex columnist Regina Lynn, "Porn marketers use 'she-male' for a very specific purpose — to sell porn to straight guys without triggering their homophobia — that has nothing to do with actual transgendered people (or helping men overcome their homophobia, either)."[41] According to sex columnist Sasha, "The term shemale is used in this setting to denote a fetishized sexual persona and is not typically used by transgendered women outside of sex work. Many transgendered women are offended by this categorization and call themselves T-girls or trans."[42]
    Tümünü Göster
    ···
  15. 65.
    +2
    There are three terms that are most commonly used in regards to the subject: bestiality, zoosexuality and zoophilia. The terms are relatively interchangeable. Zoosadism, sodomy and zooerasty are others closely related to the subject but are less homologous to the former or are uncommon usage. "Bestiosexuality" was discussed briefly by Allen (1979), but never became established.
    Zoophilia and bestiality

    The term "zoophilia" was introduced into the field of research on sexuality in Psychopathia Sexualis (1886) by Krafft-Ebing, who described a number of cases of "violation of animals (bestiality)",[2] as well as "zoophilia erotica",[3] which he defined as a sexual attraction to animal skin or fur.

    Zoophilia can refer to sexual activity with animals (bestiality), the desire to do so, or to the paraphilia of the same name which requires a definite preference for animals over humans as sexual partners.

    Some zoophiles and researchers[who?] draw a distinction between zoophilia and bestiality, using the former to describe the desire to form sexual relationships with animals, and the latter to describe the sex acts alone.

    Masters (1962) uses the term "bestialist" specifically in his discussion of zoosadism, which refers to deriving sexual pleasure from cruelty to animals. Stephanie LaFarge, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the New Jersey Medical School, and Director of Counseling at the ASPCA, writes that two groups can be distinguished: bestialists, who rape or abuse animals, and zoophiles, who form an emotional and sexual attachment to animals.[4] Williams and Weinberg studied self-defined zoophiles via the internet and found they saw the term as involving concern for the animal's welfare and pleasure, and an emphasis on believing they obtained consent, as opposed to the zoophile's concept of bestialists, who zoophiles defined as a group who focused only on their own gratification. Williams and Weinberg also quoted a British newspaper as saying that zoophilia is the term used by apologists of bestiality.[5]
    Zoosexuality

    The more recent terms "zoosexual" and "zoosexuality" have been used since the 1980s (cited by Miletski, 1999) to refer to zoophilia as a sexual orientation. The concept of zoophilia as a sexual orientation, as opposed to a fetish, paraphilia or affective bond, can be traced back to research such as Masters in the 1960s.[citation needed]

    The term 'zoosexual' itself was cited by researchers such as Miletski in the 1990s.[citation needed] It was seen as a value-neutral term which would be less susceptible to being loaded with emotion or rhetoric. Usage of the noun form can be applied to both a "zoosexual (person)" which is synonymous with zoophile, and a "zoosexual act", synonymous with bestiality or depending on the context zoophilia.
    Zoosadism and zooerasty

    Ernest Bornemann (1990, cited by Rosenbauer 1997) coined the separate term "zoosadism" for those who derive pleasure from inflicting pain on an animal, sometimes with a sexual component. Some horse-ripping incidents have a sexual connotation.[6]

    Krafft-Ebing, same author who introduced zoophilia, used the term "zooerasty" for the paraphilia of exclusive sexual attraction to animals,[7] but the term has fallen out of use.
    Tümünü Göster
    ···
  16. 66.
    +1
    alkollu olan var mi lan benden baska
    ···
  17. 67.
    +1
    @70 salçalı makarna.
    ···
  18. 68.
    +1
    mina koyim sanki jfk roportaji
    ···
  19. 69.
    +1
    @72 benim kafa hep güzel sorun değil
    ···
  20. 70.
    +1
    1. ^ a b Weinberg MS, Williams CJ (2009). Men Sexually Interested in Transwomen (MSTW): Gendered Embodiment and the Construction of Sexual Desire. J Sex Res. 2009 Jun 19:1-10. PMID 19544216
    2. ^ Shine, R., Phillips, B., & Waye, H., LeMaster, M., & Mason, R. T. (2001). Benefits of female mimicry in snakes: She-male garter snakes exploit the amorous attentions of other males to warm up. Nature, 414, 267.
    3. ^ Mason, R. T., & Crew, D. (1985). Female mimicry in garter snakes. Nature, 316, 59-60.
    4. ^ Rubenstein, D. I. (1985). Animal behaviour: The serpent's seductive scent. Nature, 316, 18-19.
    5. ^ Moore, M. C., & Lindsey, J. (1992). The physiological basis of sexual behavior in male reptiles. In C. Gans and D. Crews, Hormones, brain, and behavior: Biology of the reptilia, vol. 13, physiology E, pp. 70-113.
    6. ^ Flam, Faye (2008).The Score: How the Quest for Sex Has Shaped the Modern Man. Avery, ISBN 9781583333129
    7. ^ Roughgarden, Joan (2005). Evolution's rainbow: diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. University of California Press, ISBN 9780520246799
    8. ^ a b Blanchard, R., & Collins, P. I. (1993). Men with sexual interest in transvestites, transsexuals, and she males. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 570–575.
    9. ^ Bailey, J. Michael (2003). The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism. Joesph Henry Press, ISBN 978-0309084185
    10. ^ a b Dixon, D., & Dixon, J. (1998). She-male prostitutes: Who are they, what do they do, and why do they do it. In J. Elias, V. Bullough, V. Elias, & G. Brewer (Eds.), Prostitution: On whores, hustlers, and johns (pp. 260-266). New York: Prometheus.
    11. ^ Olsson, S.-E., & Möller, A. (2006). Regret after sex reassignment surgery in a male-to-female transsexual: A long-term follow-up. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 501-506.
    12. ^ a b Sigel, Lisa Z.; John Phillips (2005). "Walking on The Wild Side: Shemale Internet ferregraphy". International Exposure: Perspectives on Modern European ferregraphy, 1800-2000. Rutgers University Press. pp. 254–271. ISBN 0813535190, 9780813535197. http://books.google.com/books?id=KiyY_nlqaQEC . Retrieved 2008-12-14.
    13. ^ Money, J. (1984). Paraphilias: Phenomenology and classification. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 38, 164-178.
    14. ^ The Illustrated Dictionary of Sex: Gynandromorphy
    15. ^ The Illustrated Dictionary of Sex: Gynemimism
    16. ^ Money J, Lamacz M. Gynemimesis and gynemimetophilia: individual and cross-cultural manifestations of a gender-coping strategy hitherto unnamed. Compr Psychiatry. 1984 Jul-Aug;25(4):392-403.
    17. ^ Ekins, Richard (1996). Blending genders: social aspects of cross-dressing and sex-changing. Routledge, ISBN 9780415115513
    18. ^ "The she-male phenomenon and the concept of partial autogynephilia". R. Blanchard - Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1993.
    19. ^ Rosario, Vernon (2004). "Quejotobonita!": Transgender Negotiations of Sex and Ethnicity. In Ubaldo Leli, Jack Drescher (eds.) Transgender Subjectivities: A Clinician's Guide. Routledge, ISBN 9780789025760
    20. ^ a b c Herbst, Philip H. (2001), Wimmin, Wimps & Wallflowers: An Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Gender and Sexual orientation Bias in The United States, Intercultural Press, p. 252–3, ISBN 1877864803, http://books.google.com/b...IucKQBuK1_4mbWE#PPA253,M1 , retrieved 2007-10-25
    21. ^ a b Cassidy, Frederic Gomes; Joan Houston Hall (2002). Dictionary of American Regional English.. Harvard University Press. pp. 901. ISBN 0674008847, 9780674008847. http://books.google.com/books?id=i33BWgxbvXgC . Retrieved 2008-12-22.
    22. ^ Boorstin, Daniel J. (1965), "Part Seven: "Search for Symbols"", The Americans, vol. 2 The National Experience., N.Y.: Vintage, p. 335f, ISBN 0394703588
    23. ^ Green, Jonathon (2006). Cassell's Dictionary of Slang. Cassell. ISBN 9780304366361.
    24. ^ Lowe, Denise (2005). An encyclopedic dictionary of women in early American films, 1895-1930. Routledge, ISBN 9780789018434
    25. ^ Spears, Richard A (1991). A Dictionary of Slang and Euphemism. Signet, ISBN 0451165543
    26. ^ Wentworth, Harold and Stuart Berg Flexner (1975). Dictionary of American Slang. Crowell, ISBN 9780690006704
    27. ^ Oxford English Dictionary. Cambridge, MA 02238: Oxford University Press, USA. 1989. ISBN 978-0198611868.
    28. ^ Aman, Reinhold (1982). Maledicta, Volume 6, Issue 1, p. 144.
    29. ^ Raymond, J. (1994), The Transsexual Empire, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, ISBN 0807762725
    30. ^ Daly, Mary (1985). Beyond God the Father: toward a philosophy of women's liberation. Beacon Press, ISBN 9780807015032
    31. ^ Finnegan D, McNally E (2002). Counseling Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Substance Abusers: Dual Identities. Routledge, ISBN 9780789004031
    32. ^ Feinberg, Leslie (1997). Transgender Warriors. Beacon Press, ISBN 9780807079416
    33. ^ Staff report (October 05, 2007). GLAAD Condemns "Dehumanizing" Page Six New York Post Column. The Advocate
    34. ^ GLAAD GLAAD Media Reference Guide: Defamatory Language.
    35. ^ Carmichael, Amy (June 8, 2002). Rare 'shemales' seek respect and understanding. The Toronto Star
    36. ^ Bornstein, Kate (1994). Gender outlaw: on men, women, and the rest of us. Routledge, ISBN 9780415908979
    37. ^ Brown M, Rounsley C. (1996) True Selves: Understanding Transsexualism-For Families, Friends, Coworkers, and Helping Professionals. Jossey-Bass, ISBN 9780787902711
    38. ^ Castañeda , Laura and Shannon B. Campbell News and Sexuality: Media Portraits of Diversity. SAGE, ISBN 9781412909990
    39. ^ Ditmore, Melissa Hope (2006). Encyclopedia of Prostitution and Sex Work. Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 9780313329685
    40. ^ Serano, Julia (2007). Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity. Seal press, ISBN 9781580051545, p. 175.
    41. ^ Lynn, Regina (March 16, 2007). When Words Fail, So Do We. Wired
    42. ^ Sasha (October 9, 2008). Green sex toys. Montreal Mirror
    43. ^ Sagalyn, Lynne B. (2003). Times Square Roulette: Remaking the City Icon. MIT Press, ISBN 9780262692953
    44. ^ Dargis, Manola (May 4, 2008). Is There a Real Woman in This Multiplex? New York Times
    Tümünü Göster
    ···