@4 sukuladim...

okumadım ama @2DEN DOLAYI ŞUKU

nick-entry uyumsuzluğu saptandı.

: )

AP--SALT LAKE CITY � The woman charged with murder for allegedly refusing a Caesarean section (search) that doctors say would have saved her twins pleaded not guilty Monday.
Since this story is just developing, I want to do a little experiment based upon the news coverage in this case.
After reading Sophie Treadwell's M.nal and the portrayal of reporters as biased story-creators (not reporters), I have decided to ask you, wonderful blogging pals, for a favor.
Which source, ,fox reuters, or KSL-online coverage, is the most sympathetic? Objective? Or can't you tell the difference?
If you can find an article that is completely one way or another, please post a link. I would love to talk about this.
What made the piece biased? The selection of quotes, the author's voice? How does the view of the organization or reporter intrude upon the facts of the case?
I urge everyone to participate, even if it is a few words.
I am not stating my opinion right now, but who knows? Maybe I will let something slip in my coverage. * Or have I already. The woman looks so much like Charlize Theron in Monster it is creepy--put upon creepy.