lets speak english

1.

-4

i am from norway and i like sex. because i dont give my ass to anybody. but people want my ass and fuck. when i said i am a turk, people run to mountain. i like winds. burn from the dark i said everbody. everbody loves why not me. however problematically so. The pleasant awareness of common sense that forms the principle of aesthetic discourse therefore cannot be constitutive, which we could also have derived from the fact that we cannot prove a thing's beauty on the ground of this awareness. So the principle of aesthetic discourse must indeed be regulative: it rests upon the identity of aesthetic experience. In short, for aesthetic discourse aesthetic experience itself functions as the regulative principle. Again, the empirically indistinct character of aesthetic experience can, in combination with its regulative functionality, be accounted for by taking it as functioning within aesthetic discourse as an 'asymptotic' ideality, rather than as an identifiable and substantial empirical event. There are two important aspects to this ideality. On the one hand the aesthetic experience may be an actuality for some of us at some specific time, but even then no determinate claims as to this actuality will provide a knock-down argument, nor will they deepen the relevant issue. We will not be convinced of a thing's beauty by a statement such as: "Believe you me, I had this aesthetic experience when contemplating this object, so it must be beautiful." Moreover, no empirical identification of the aesthetic experience is ever going to be operable, as the symptoms of aesthetic experience reveal an obvious vagueness.42 All this is not accidental, but rather proves its merely regulative nature. As such the aesthetic experience is an ideality, and may just as well, without loss of regulative functionality, be a figment of the imagination. On the other hand this aesthetic experience is an idealization in that we ascribe comprehensiveness, and coherence to it, and take it to include many important realizations, such as our feeling of being at home in the world, in life, and amongst other people. In sum, the strategy yielded by this article to account for aesthetic experience's decisive role in discourse on aesthetic excellence is twofold: first, we must understand such discourse as antinomic, in that for cognitive considerations to be significant they ought to be supplemented by an experiential reflection of these. However, secondly, this aesthetic experience is merely a regulative ideal. If we want to get rid of the notion altogether we need other arguments than the ones stating its empirical nonidentifyability. NOTES 1 Of those who are engaged in this problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositions, such as his division between transcendental idealism and empirical realism, may prove to be rather crucial for his aesthetic theory, but I will not go into these matters here. 6 In keeping with Meredith's translation I use the term 'sound understanding' for our everyday common sense, and 'common sense' for the idea of universal rationality described in Kant's analysis, for 'Gemeinsinn', i.e. See also section v below. References to Kant's Critique of Judgement are, respectively, to the Meredith translation (1928), the B-edition (1793), and the Suhrkamp edition (1974). The demand of an experiential supplement ought to be distinguished from the Kantian position concerning knowledge being a function of the forms of intuition and of the categories in that with regard to knowledge the experiential demand is general and does not have to be met in every given case: with regard to knowledge one can justified in believing certain claims on the mere grounds of testimony. This possibility is excluded from the aesthetiomain. 7 In par. 17 of the Critique of Judgement, and again in par. 34. 8 "Therefore [judgements of taste] must have a subjective principle, and one which determines what pleases or displeases, by means of feeling only and not through concepts, but yet with universal validity. Such a principle, however, could only be regarded as a common sense." (CJ, M82 (KU, B 65, 157)). 9 CJ, M84 (K the note in the 'Remark' of the deduction of judgements of taste (par. 38, CJ, M147 (KU, B151, 221). 11 CJ, M85e taken to mean some external sense, but the effect arising from the free play of our powers of cognition)." (CJ, M83 (KU, B64-65, 157). 13 "It may be a matter of uncertainty whether a person who thinks he is laying down a judgement of taste is, in fact, judging in conformity with that idea; but that this idea is what is contemplated [darauf beziehe] in his judgement, and that, consequently, it is meant to be a judgement of taste, is proclaimed by his use of the expression 'beauty'. For himself he can be certain on the point from his mere consciousness of the separation of everything belonging to the agreeable and the good from the delight remaining to him; and this is all for which he promises himself the agreement of every one a claim which, under these conditions, he would also be warranted in making, were all friends i said. i like sex all time.

Tümünü Göster

efendi adam geri geldi
07.01.2010 03:56

···

#744613 şikayet

2.

+1

"when i said i am a turk, people run to mountain"

white
07.01.2010 03:57

···

#744682 şikayet

3.

-1

do you want to play tennis with my penis ?

otuzbire ara verdim
25.10.2011 14:08

···

#60834215 şikayet

4.

0

high school student detecdet

pipimiye
28.08.2010 00:43

···

#15783096 şikayet

5.

0

english.. i dont speak english; you speak english?

pazarfordculari
28.08.2010 00:44

···

#15783229 şikayet

6.

0

pass summary bitch

ögp

kodummu sit down
28.08.2010 00:45

···

#15783277 şikayet

7.

0

the position is so good..go on baby!

miniminibirkuskonmustu
28.08.2010 00:47 ~ 00:48

···

#15783682 şikayet

8.

0

@1 give brief bastard.

fuck off readers

indokhan
28.08.2010 01:04

···

#15785810 şikayet

9.

0

ı luv the way u kiss me
ı luv the way u touch
ı like ur smell
ı like ur skin
so com'on
f me

modlarbubenimfeykim
28.08.2010 01:37

···

#15790198 şikayet

10.

0

Tümünü Göster

demli cayla kafa bulan
25.10.2011 14:04

···

#60833883 şikayet

11.

0

i am the best fucker, i fuck takır takır

otuzbire ara verdim
25.10.2011 14:07

···

#60834193 şikayet

12.

0

we are in this struggle not to kill someone but to kill the idea that one kind of man is better than another kind of man.

anderus
25.10.2011 14:17

···

#60834968 şikayet

13.

0

you dont know ki your eyes and face is plays .

super mar1o
25.10.2011 14:18

···

#60835097 şikayet

14.

0

hi guys. i think everybody can speak english. lets speak english here...

leonardoremifasollasi
18.02.2016 23:25

···

#168417695 şikayet

15.

0

konuyu ingilizce bilmeyenler için özetliyorum.
eve nasıl kız atılır onu çözdük. çok şey kaybettiniz.

leonardoremifasollasi
19.02.2016 00:12

···

#168419119 şikayet

16.

0

pass an "ozet" busterd

dakyaprak
28.08.2010 00:34

···

#15781880 şikayet

17.

0

i norway ve i like sex duyuyorum. i dont çünkü herkes için kıçımı verir. ama insanlar benim eşek ve lanet istiyorum. dedim ne zaman i bir turk am, insanların dağa çalıştırın. i gibi rüzgarlar. koyu i Herkesin söyledi dan yanmak. Herkesin sevdiği neden ben değilim. Ancak sorunsal öyle. Bu nedenle, biz de gerçeği bu bilincin yerde bir şey güzellik ispat edemez türemiş olabileceğini kurucu olamaz estetik söylemin ilke formları sağduyu hoş farkındalık. estetik söylemin ilke Yani gerçekten düzenleyici olmalı: estetik deneyim kimlik dayalı. estetik söylem estetik deneyim kendisi için, görev Kısacası düzenleyici ilkesi olarak. Yine, estetik deneyim olabilir, onun düzenleyici işlevi ile kombinasyon ve ampirik belirsiz karakter için estetik söylem içinde bir 'ideality ziyade olarak tanımlanabilir ve önemli ampirik olay asimptotik olarak işlev olarak alarak hesaba. Bu ideality iki önemli yönü var. Bir taraftan estetik deneyim üzerine bazı özel zaman bazılarımız için bir güncelliği, ama o zaman bile bu gerçeklik bir knock-down argüman sağlayacak hiçbir belirli iddiaları, ne de ilgili sorunu derinleştirmek olacaktır olabilir. Biz bir şey güzellik gibi bir açıklama ile ikna olmayacaktır: "Bana inan, bu estetik deneyim bu nesneye düşündüğünü vardı, bu yüzden güzel olmalı." Ayrıca, estetik deneyim hiçbir ampirik kimlik hiç operabl olmak, estetik deneyim semptomlar bariz bir vagueness.42 Bütün bunlar göstermektedir gidiyor yanlışlıkla değil, daha çok onun sadece düzenleyici doğa kanıtlıyor. Gibi estetik deneyim bir ideality ve olabilir gibi iyi düzenleyici işlevi kaybı olmadan hayal ürünü olmak. Öte yandan bu estetik deneyim üzerine biz kapsam atfetmek idealize ve tutarlılık için, ve o hayatta dünyada evde olmanın bizim hissi gibi birçok önemli gerçekleşmeler, ve diğer insanlar arasında yer alır. Özetle, strateji, bu makalenin estetik mükemmellik üzerine söylem estetik deneyim rol hesaba vermiştir iki kat: ilk önce biz bilişsel değerlendirmeler için önemli onlar gerektiğini desteklenen olmak için antinomic gibi söylem, anlamak gerekir bir deneyimsel Bunların yansıması. Ancak, ikinci olarak, bu estetik deneyim sadece bir düzenleyici idealdir. Biz kavramı kurtulmak tamamen biz olanları onun ampirik nonidentifyability belirten başka argümanlar ihtiyaç almak istiyorsan. o kim bu sorunlu Nicholas Wolterstorff yürütülmektedir Of NOTLAR 1 forward bir nesne sevme için sadece kendine has nedenleri iter belirleyici ('Kant'ın Teorisi ile bir Nişan Güzellik', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant'ın Estetik, Atascadero, Cal ., 1991, s. 105 vd). Anthony Savile (parlak Kantçı Estetik Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) ve Mary Mothersill onu yazıda 'Taste of Çatışkı içinde' (Meerbote, 1991, s. 75 vd.) Değerlendirme olasılığı her iki doğrudan dikkatimizi içeriği ile ilgili kararın gerçek değeri. 2 Wiggins, D.: Değerler, Gerçek ihtiyaçlar: Değer Felsefe Denemeler. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, kompozisyon V: 'A Sensible subjektivizm?' 3 Ben güzelliği ve yüce arasındaki farkı anlaşılabilir, ama sanmıyorum buna karşı bu yazıda tartışmayacağım. Onun yerine eşit olarak, onları tedavi edecek ve yerine 'estetik mükemmellik', hangi herkes kabul edecektir konuşmak hem de kapsamaktadır. 4 eski stratejisinin önemli bir örnek Monroe Beardsley ve George Dickie ise Nelson Goodman yazılarının açıkça ikinci takip bulunabilir. transandantal idealizm ve ampirik realizmi ile onun bölünme 5 bazı Kant'ın şartlar, in tartışmalı karakteri gibi değil onun estetik teorisi için önemli olabileceği, ama bu konularda buradan gitmeyeceğim. 6 Meredith's tercüme Ben günlük sağduyu için ses anlayış 'terimini kullanmak tutmak ve' sağduyu 'evrensel rasyonalite Kant'ın analiz açıklanan fikir için ise,' için Gemeinsinn ', yani bölümüne de v aşağıya bakınız. Kant'ın Eleştirisi kıyamet referanslar, sırasıyla, Meredith çeviri (1928) için, B-baskı (1793) ve Suhrkamp baskı (1974). deneyimsel bir ekinin talep gerektiğini deneyimsel talep genel bir Kantçı pozisyon bilgisi sezginin formları ve kategorilerin bir fonksiyonu bilgisi ile ilgili olarak ilgili ayırt edilmesi ve her verilen durumda yerine getirilmesi gerekmez : bilgi ile ilgili bir tanıklık sadece gerekçesiyle bazı iddiaları inanarak haklı olabilir. Bu olasılık aesthetiomain dışındadır. 7 par içinde. 17 Eleştirisi kıyamet, ve yine paragrafında. 34. tat] 8 "Bu nedenle [yargıları ve öznel bir ilke olmalıdır biri ne mutlu veya displeases, sadece duygu değil kavramlar üzerinden yoluyla, ancak henüz evrensel geçerliliği ile belirler. Böyle bir ilke, ancak, sadece kabul edilebilir bir sağduyu. " (CJ, M82 (KU, B 65, 157)). 9 CJ, M84 (K notu 'Açıklama' tat kararlarının kesinti (par. 38, CJ, ve M147 (KU, B151, 221). 11 CJ, M85e alındığı, ancak etkisi bazı dış anlamda demek biliş gücümüzü serbest oyundan) doğan. "(CJ, M83 (KU, B64-65, 157). 13" Bu belirsizlik mi o tadı bir hüküm ortaya koyan olduğunu düşünen bir kişi bir konu olabilir Aslında, uygunluk olduğu fikri ile yargılamak, ama bu düşünce ne kendi yargısına göre, [darauf beziehe] düşünülen ve bu, sonuç olarak, bu tat bir yargı olmak için içindir ilan ifade onun kullanımı tarafından 'güzellik'. kendisi için o belirli noktada her şeyi ve iyi hoş için zevk ona kalan den ait ayrılması onun sadece bilinç arasında olabilir ve bu kendisi için kendisi her birinin anlaşmanın söz Hepsi bu bu şartlar altında, o da garanti verme olacağını iddia, tüm arkadaşlar i söyledi. i gibi ciks her zaman.

Tümünü Göster

gotunu kasi
28.08.2010 00:34

···

#15781863 şikayet

18.

0

@15 im reading mannn yea

comolokko
28.08.2010 00:31

···

#15781471 şikayet

19.

0

this problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositiothis problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositiothis problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositiothis problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositiothis problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositiothis problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositiothis problematic Nicholas Wolterstorff pushes forward our merely idiosyncratic reasons for liking an object as decisive ('An Engagement With Kant's Theory of Beauty', in: Ralf Meerbote (ed.): Kant's Aesthetics, Atascadero, Cal., 1991, p. 105 ff). Anthony Savile (in his brilliant Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh, 1993) and Mary Mothersill in her article on 'The Antinomy of Taste' (in Meerbote, 1991, p. 75 ff.), both direct our attention to the possibility of assessment of the truth value of the judgement with regard to its content. 2 Wiggins, D.: Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, essay V: 'A Sensible Subjectivism?' 3 I do not think that the distinction between beauty and the sublime is intelligible, but will not argue against it in this paper. Instead I will treat them as on a par, and talk instead of 'aesthetic excellence', which everybody will agree comprises both. 4 An important example of the former strategy can be found in Nelson Goodman's writings whereas Monroe Beardsley and George Dickie clearly follow the latter. 5 The controversial character of some of Kant's presuppositio

Tümünü Göster

ne atiyonuz lan
07.01.2010 03:57

···

#744699 şikayet

20.

0

shorter bitch

am kokusu geldi burnuma
07.01.2010 03:58

···

#744745 şikayet

LÜTFEN İLGİLİ KONULARI , İLGİLİ ALT İNCİLERE AÇINIZ. BURASI SÖZLÜK İLE ALAKALI BİR ALT İNCİDİR

ALT İNCİ KURALLARI GENEL OLARAK BUNLAR

Her türlü öneri ve şikayetleriniz için sözlük moderasyonu ile veya alt inci adminleri ile iletişime geçebilirsiniz