evrim teorisinde ki inanılmaz mantık hatası

@2 yeni bir motto kazandırmanın peşinde inci sözlük'e.

@1 zütveren, evrim teorisini x y dışında reddeden bir bilim otoritesi yok kanıtlanmasa bile bilimsel olarak başka bir teori yok. sihirbazın biri hokus pokus yapıp bütün canlıları yarattı deme, giberim. çok biliyorsan daha iyi bir sentez yap zütüne kodum.

(bkz: evrimi kabul etmeyenlere tokat gibi yanıt)

okumadım

copy paste

@4 ülke kazansın

beyler adam vasat ekşi trolü galiba

adam ya şakirt ya da seviyeyi yükselterek inciye saldırıyo beyler

@1 sensin

Ayrıca teori desen bile. @9'da verdiğim linkte:

The scientific definition of the word "theory" is different from the colloquial sense of the word. Colloquially, "theory" can mean a conjecture, an opinion, or a speculation that does not have to be based on facts or make testable predictions. In science, the meaning of theory is more rigorous: a theory must be based on observed facts and make testable predictions.

In science, a current theory is a theory that has no equally acceptable or more acceptable alternative theory, and has survived attempts at falsification. That is, there have been no observations made that contradict it to this point and, indeed, every observation ever made either supports the current theory or at least does not falsify it by contradicting it completely. A revision of the current theory, or the generation of a new theory is necessary if new observations contradict the current theory, as the current findings are in need of a new explanation (see scientific revolution or paradigm shift). However, the falsification of a theory does not falsify the facts on which the theory is based.

özet geçemedim binler kusura bakmayın

okumıcam

@1 ak sakallı dedelerden vahi mi indi a.q..ne çeşit karabasanlar girmiş..

okumadum özet geç

upupupupupuppuupupupupupupu