1. 1.
    +2
    takribi 2008e tekabul ediyor ha bi de max dondurmalarindan taso cikardi renk renk hey gidi genclik.
    ···
  1. 2.
    0
    Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The
    book in which they are embodied was published by Sergyei Nilus in Russia in
    1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception
    August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed
    in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by
    anyone in Sovietland was crime sufficient to ensure the owner’s being shot on
    sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols.
    The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be
    understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had
    concocted them for his own purposes.
    Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York World, February
    17, 1921, put the, case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:
    The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on.
    They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT
    NOW.
    Indeed they do!
    The word “Protocol” signifies a precis gummed on to the front of a document,
    a draft of a document, minutes of proceedings. In this instance “Protocol” means
    “minutes of the proceedings” of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion.
    These Protocols give the substance of addresses delivered to the innermost circle
    of the Rulers of Zion. They reveal the concerted plan of action of the Jewish
    Nation developed through the ages and edited by the Elders themselves up to
    date. Parts and summaries of the plan have been published from time to time
    during the centuries as the secrets of the Elders have leaked out. The claim of the
    Jews that the Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their
    genuineness, for they never attempt to answer the facts corresponding to the
    threats which the Protocols contain, and, indeed, the correspondence between
    prophecy and fulfilment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This the Jews
    well know and therefore evade.
    The presumption is strong that the Protocols were issued, or reissued, at the
    First Zionist Congress held at Basle in 1897 under the presidency of the Father
    of Modern Zionism, the late Theodore Herzl.
    ···