1. 1.
    +2
    bende paragrafin ilk 2 kelimesini cevireyim

    In physics = fizikte
    ···
  2. 2.
    +1
    yarra yemişsin. gibişmeden ölme bence
    ···
  3. 3.
    +1
    1.2 The Legendre test
    The Euler-Lagrange di erential equation just introduced represents a necessary,
    but not sucient, condition for the solution of the fundamental variational
    problem.
    The alternative functional of
    I() =
    Z x1
    x0
    f(x; Y; Y 0)dx;
    may be expanded as
    I() =
    Z x1
    x0
    f(x; y + (x); y0 + 0(x))dx:
    Assuming that the f function has continuous partial derivatives, the meanvalue
    theorem is applicable:
    f(x; y + (x); y0 + 0(x)) = f(x; y; y0)+
    ((x)
    @f(x; y; y0)
    @y
    + 0(x)
    @f(x; y; y0)
    @y0 ) + O(2):
    By substituting we obtain
    I() =
    Z x1
    x0
    f(x; y; y0)dx+
    
    Z x1
    x0
    ((x)
    @f(x; y; y0)
    @y
    + 0(x)
    @f(x; y; y0)
    @y0 )dx + O(2):
    With the introduction of
    I1 = 
    Z x1
    x0
    ((x)
    @f(x; y; y0)
    @y
    + 0(x)
    @f(x; y; y0)
    @y0 )dx;
    we can write
    I() = I(0) + I1 + O(2);
    where I1 is called the rst variation. The vanishing of the rst variation is a
    necessary, but not sucient, condition to have an extremum. To establish a
    sucient condition, assuming that the function is thrice continuously di erentiable,
    we further expand as
    I() = I(0) + I1 + I2 + O(3):
    © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
    8 Applied calculus of variations for engineers
    Here the newly introduced second variation is
    I2 =
    2
    2
    Z x1
    x0
    (2(x)
    @2f(x; y; y0)
    @y2 +
    2(x)0(x)
    @2f(x; y; y0)
    @y@y0 +
    02(x)
    @2f(x; y; y0)
    @y02 )dx:
    We now possess all the components to test for the existence of the extremum
    (maximum or minimum). The Legendre test in [5] states that if independently
    of the choice of the auxiliary (x) function
    - the Euler-Lagrange equation is satis ed,
    - the rst variation vanishes (I1 = 0), and
    - the second variation does not vanish (I2 6= 0)
    over the interval of integration, then the functional has an extremum. This
    test manifests the necessary conditions for the existence of the extremum.
    Speci cally, the extremum will be a maximum if the second variation is negative,
    and conversely a minimum if it is positive. Certain similarities to the
    extremum evaluation of regular functions by the teaching of classical calculus
    are obvious.
    We nally introduce the variation of the function as
    y = Y (x) 􀀀 y(x) = (x);
    and the variation of the derivative as
    y0 = Y 0(x) 􀀀 y0(x) = 0(x):
    Based on these variations, we distinguish between the following cases:
    - strong extremum occurs when y is small, however, y0 is large, while
    - weak extremum occurs when both y and y0 are small.
    On a nal note: the above considerations did not ever state the nding or
    presence of an absolute extremum; only the local extremum in the interval of
    the integrand is obtained.
    © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
    The foundations of calculus of variations 9
    1.3 The Euler-Lagrange di erential equation
    Let us expand the derivative in the second term of the Euler-Lagrange di erential
    equation as follows:
    d
    dx
    @f
    @y0 =
    @2f
    @x@y0 +
    @2f
    @y@y0 y0 +
    @2f
    @y02 y00:
    This demonstrates that the Euler-Lagrange equation is usually of second order.
    @f
    @y 􀀀
    @2f
    @x@y0 􀀀
    @2f
    @y@y0 y0 􀀀
    @2f
    @y02 y00 = 0:
    The above form is also called the extended form. Consider the case when the
    multiplier of the second derivative term vanishes:
    @2f
    @y02 = 0:
    In this case f must be a linear function of y0, in the form of
    f(x; y; y0) = p(x; y) + q(x; y)y0:
    For this form, the other derivatives of the equation are computed as
    @f
    @y
    =
    @p
    @y
    +
    @q
    @y
    y0;
    @f
    @y0 = q;
    @2f
    @x@y0 =
    @q
    @x
    ;
    and
    @2f
    @y@y0 =
    @q
    @y
    :
    Substituting results in the Euler-Lagrange di erential equation of the form
    @p
    @y 􀀀
    @q
    @x
    = 0;
    or
    @p
    @y
    =
    @q
    @x
    :
    In order to have a solution, this must be an identity, in which case there must
    be a function of two variables
    u(x; y)
    © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
    10 Applied calculus of variations for engineers
    whose total di erential is of the form
    du = p(x; y)dx + q(x; y)dy = f(x; y; y0)dx:
    The functional may be evaluated as
    I(y) =
    Z x1
    x0
    f(x; y; y0)dx =
    Z x1
    x0
    du = u(x1; y1) 􀀀 u(x0; y0):
    It follows from this that the necessary and sucient condition for the solution
    of the Euler-Lagrange di erential equation is that the integrand of the
    functional be the total di erential with respect to x of a certain function of
    both x and y.
    Considering furthermore, that the Euler-Lagrange di erential equation is
    linear with respect to f, it also follows that a term added to f will not change
    the necessity and suciency of that condition.
    Another special case may be worthy of consideration. Let us assume that
    the integrand does not explicitly contain the x term. Then by executing the
    di erentiations
    d
    dx
    (y0 @f
    @y0 􀀀 f) =
    y0 d
    dx
    @f
    @y0 􀀀
    @f
    @x 􀀀
    @f
    @y
    y0 =
    y0(
    d
    dx
    @f
    @y0 􀀀
    @f
    @y
    ) 􀀀
    @f
    @x
    :
    With the last term vanishing in this case, the di erential equation simpli es to
    d
    dx
    (y0 @f
    @y0 􀀀 f) = 0:
    Its consequence is the expression also known as Beltrami's formula:
    y0 @f
    @y0 􀀀 f = c1; (1.1)
    where the right-hand side term is an integration constant. The classical problem
    of the brachistochrone, discussed in the next section, belongs to this class.
    Finally, it is also often the case that the integrand does not contain the y
    term explicitly. Then
    @f
    @y
    = 0
    © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
    The foundations of calculus of variations 11
    and the di erential equation has the simpler
    d
    dx
    @f
    @y0 = 0
    form. As above, the result is
    @f
    @y0 = c2
    where c2 is another integration constant. The geodesic problems, also the
    subject of Chapter 7, represent this type of Euler-Lagrange equations.
    We can surmise that the Euler-Lagrange di erential equation's general solution
    is of the form
    y = y(x; c1; c2);
    where the c1; c2 are constants of integration, and are solved from the boundary
    conditions
    y0 = y(x0; c1; c2)
    and
    y1 = y(x1; c1; c2):
    Tümünü Göster
    ···
  4. 4.
    +1
    In Germany, almanyada
    demek haydi iyi gunumdesin bir kelime cevirdim amina koyum
    ···
  5. 5.
    +1
    zütügibli
    ···
  6. 6.
    +1
    hmm bu ne bugünlerde bu mu komik, iyi ya şebeklerin olması sözlükte eğleniriz amua goyim
    ···
  7. 7.
    +1
    wikiyi kopyalıcana ananı kopyala it oğlu it
    ···
  8. 8.
    +1
    beni uğraştırma gib kendini.. flood yaptığın için yaptığın flood kadar kendini gib
    ···
  9. 9.
    +1
    şimdi çevirin bunu diycek at
    ···
  10. 10.
    +1
    en yakın köprüden atla daha acısız olur
    ···