yeter amk yeter kim kıllı taklu zütünüze yok 1 milyon dolar yok bugatti yok ebenin dıbını verecek de konuşuyorsunuz sıkıldım artık sözlükten. ben gidiyorum.

i am ok i am alright dediğinde boşalıyorun

@1 al caponun sol taşşağındaki yumurtalık

@22 sen anlasan yeter panpa @23 herkes anlasın diye yazdım zibidi

@2 kanıp sallayan sensin amk

kafanızı mimetiksçiler gibsin

biz gülüyor muyuz?

e mi?

inci sözlük hatası: entry metni girilmelidir.

tabi ebe gibmek şart olur.

pm

^^ kk

amk açlıktan ölüyodum zaten piö adresini ver buzdolabını gibicem

adam hindistanlı beyler

@9 daha anlamındaki daha ayrı yazılır

boş ver sen onu abaza esprileri yap sen

eğlenin beyler şukuya falan gerek yok büzüğünüz sağolsun

daha bitmedi amk

herkes için app

http://webtv.kanald.com.tr/canliyayin/

ön-edit:ligtv olmayınca giblenmiyoruz di mi amk?

...
.:lokmmmmmmmmmm0l
.;dommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmw.
.ckwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo
.dxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo
.xwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo:.
lxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwooxc'
.;lxoooooxdl:. cmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwkklc'..
'llc.. ..:ommmmmmkxnmmmmmmmmmm0kl:'.
:0' cmmmmmmmmmmmmwd'.
.k:l0 .mmmmmmmmmml.
,k w ,mmmmmmmmmmmmn0dl'
m. m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkx:.
cmmk wmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmxd'
nmmm: mmmmmmmmmmmxwmmmmmmmmmmmmnd'
kmmmw mmmmmmmmmmm' ;xmmmmmmmmmmmmmwd'
mmmm xmmmmmmmmmmm dmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnc
'' nmkwl' .kmmmmmmmmmmm' :mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmd
kmwmkok ' ,lxmmmmmmmmmmm; .kmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm0
kmmmmm. .commmmmw' kmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmx
coxmnxl. ... .mwd. .0cc:' .nmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmk
.cololoxkwwwxwmmmmmmm: m c:. .l0ok ommmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.'mo,mmmmnk:lo' :l .ommmml .ommmmmmmmmmmmn
x0'okxkxok;. :: ,.xmmmmmmo :o lxmmmmmmmmk
kc,,o0m0.:;c'n ko;lmmmmmm:'xmmmnwko,.clxdl:.
;00xkm:d , .. ommmmmm cmmmmmmmml
c n0l . .l:;;okmmk mmmmmmmmm0
o ,.ococ..l..k' .:c;'o 0mmmmmmmx.
x n..l .c k. ommmmmmm
.' c. : m . ommm0,.;
:, n.;w ; o... o .,.
d m ;x' :l :
d..':. lckol,,,,'.:c,,'.cd;'o,'.
. ;:,wmmmmmmxx,; m0xxnnwm.
mmmmmmmm .mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm .mmmmmmmm.
:onmmmmmm0:':mmmmmmmmm:
;c:,'',::lx' , .mmmmmmmmmmwk:c:
x. .lloc;.',lxl.. lkmmmmmkl m
0 .;,;'... ;::c' .. ;dl;l'
;o: .d' .lkk::::;, 'k
n.'oc'. m : x
lo:. ',::xn: .x0'
.,lccccm .ll,. . ;;:::;c'.0
.kl. .c::lcccccc:cc::; .''clccl.
'lcl:lc::,,'::cc:cc:c,..

...
.:lokmmmmmmmmmm0l
.;dommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmw.
.ckwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo
.dxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo
.xwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo:.
lxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwooxc'
.;lxoooooxdl:. cmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwkklc'..
'llc.. ..:ommmmmmkxnmmmmmmmmmm0kl:'.
:0' cmmmmmmmmmmmmwd'.
.k:l0 .mmmmmmmmmml.
,k w ,mmmmmmmmmmmmn0dl'
m. m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkx:.
cmmk wmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmxd'
nmmm: mmmmmmmmmmmxwmmmmmmmmmmmmnd'
kmmmw mmmmmmmmmmm' ;xmmmmmmmmmmmmmwd'
mmmm xmmmmmmmmmmm dmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnc
'' nmkwl' .kmmmmmmmmmmm' :mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmd
kmwmkok ' ,lxmmmmmmmmmmm; .kmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm0
kmmmmm. .commmmmw' kmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmx
coxmnxl. ... .mwd. .0cc:' .nmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmk
.cololoxkwwwxwmmmmmmm: m c:. .l0ok ommmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.'mo,mmmmnk:lo' :l .ommmml .ommmmmmmmmmmmn
x0'okxkxok;. :: ,.xmmmmmmo :o lxmmmmmmmmk
kc,,o0m0.:;c'n ko;lmmmmmm:'xmmmnwko,.clxdl:.
;00xkm:d , .. ommmmmm cmmmmmmmml
c n0l . .l:;;okmmk mmmmmmmmm0
o ,.ococ..l..k' .:c;'o 0mmmmmmmx.
x n..l .c k. ommmmmmm
.' c. : m . ommm0,.;
:, n.;w ; o... o .,.
d m ;x' :l :
d..':. lckol,,,,'.:c,,'.cd;'o,'.
. ;:,wmmmmmmxx,; m0xxnnwm.
mmmmmmmm .mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm .mmmmmmmm.
:onmmmmmm0:':mmmmmmmmm:
;c:,'',::lx' , .mmmmmmmmmmwk:c:
x. .lloc;.',lxl.. lkmmmmmkl m
0 .;,;'... ;::c' .. ;dl;l'
;o: .d' .lkk::::;, 'k
n.'oc'. m : x
lo:. ',::xn: .x0'
.,lccccm .ll,. . ;;:::;c'.0
.kl. .c::lcccccc:cc::; .''clccl.
'lcl:lc::,,'::cc:cc:c,..

…………………………………….__,,,,,,,---,,,,,,_…………………………………………………………
…………………………_,,,--~’’¯¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯’’-,,_………………………………………………….
…………………….,-*,_……………………………………………
…………………,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’~-,,………………………………………
……………..,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _,,_ ; ; ;¯’-,…………………………………..
…………..,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-‘’_ ¯’-, ; ; ; ; ‘,…………………………………
…………,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-*-,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-‘;;;’, : :||; ; ; ; ; ‘,……………………………….
……….,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-‘/ :,-*, : ‘,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,-‘ : // ; ; ; ; ; ;’,……………………………..
……..,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’,| : ‘-,;;;;,-‘ : /’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ¯’’’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,……………………………
…….,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-,,___,,-*,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,………………………….
…….| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;-,;;’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-………………………….
……,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;-;;;;| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |…………………………
……| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-‘,;;;;|’’-~ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘,…………………………
... | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;---,,,,,,,_,,,,-~’’, ‘-,;;;| ,,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’,……………………….
……| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯’’~-,,,_ , , , , , , ‘,;,’,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;……………………….
……| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-,~-,, , ,,’’,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’,………………………
……’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’-,,¯’’;;;;| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’,………………………
…….| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-,_,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘,………………………
…….’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’,……………………..
……..’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; …………………….
……… ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘,……………………
……….’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;|……………………
………..| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,………………….
………..’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,--* )" >*, ; ; ,,-*~-,, ; ; ; ; ; ;’,………………..
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘’ . ,,--,, . ‘-, ; ; ; ;| . ,-,, . ‘, | . . | ; ;’-, . .,,/ . ./’-,,--, . ‘, ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,………………
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; | . .,’ ; ; ;’, . .| ; ; ; | . .’-‘ . ,-‘ | . . | ; ; ; ‘-, . . .,-‘ ; ;,-‘ . ,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,…………….
…………’, ; ; ; ; ; ;’, . ‘-,__,-‘ . ,’ ; ; ; | . .| . . . | . . |___ ; ;} . . / ; ; ;’---‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,………….
………….| ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,,_ . ._,,-‘ ; ; ; ; |__| .__ ;|_____/ ; ;/__/ ; ; ; ; (¯) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,…………
……... ’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,………
…………,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,_
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;

main article: internet meme
the term "internet meme" refers to a catchphrase or concept that spreads rapidly from person to person via the internet, largely through internet-based email, blogs, forums, imageboards, social networking sites and instant messaging.
[edit]meme maps

one technique of meme mapping represents the evolution and transmission of a meme across time and space.[33] such a meme map uses a figure-8 diagram (an analemma) to map the gestation (in the lower loop), birth (at the choke point), and development (in the upper loop) of the selected meme. such meme maps are non-scalar, with time mapped onto the y-axis and space onto the x-axis transect. one can read the temporal progress of the mapped meme from south to north on such a meme map. paull has published a worked example using the "organics meme" (as in organic agriculture).[33]
robertson (2010) [34] used a second technique of meme mapping to create two-dimensional representations of the selves of eleven participants drawn from both individualist and collectivist cultures. participant narratives were transcribed, segmented and coded using a method similar to grounded theory. coded segments exhibiting referent, connotative, affective and behavioral dimensions were declared to be memes. memes that shared connotative, affective or behavioral qualities were linked. all of the maps in robertson's sample evidenced volition, constancy, uniqueness, production, intimacy, and social interest.
[edit]

criticism of meme theory

an objection to the study of the evolution of memes in genetic terms (although not to the existence of memes) involves a perceived gap in the gene/meme analogy: the cumulative evolution of genes depends on biological selection-pressures neither too great nor too small in relation to mutation-rates. there seems no reason to think that the same balance will exist in the selection pressures on memes.[21]
luis benitez-bribiesca m.d., a critic of memetics, calls the theory a "pseudoscientific dogma" and "a dangerous idea that poses a threat to the serious study of consciousness and cultural evolution". as a factual criticism, benitez-bribiesca points to the lack of a "code script" for memes (analogous to the dna of genes), and to the excessive instability of the meme mutation mechanism (that of an idea going from one brain to another), which would lead to a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate, rendering the evolutionary process chaotic.[22]
another critique comes from semiotic theorists such as deacon[23] and kull[24] this view regards the concept of "meme" as a primitivized concept of "sign". the meme is thus described[by whom?] in memetics as a sign lacking a triadic nature. semioticians can regard a meme as a "degenerate" sign, which includes only its ability of being copied. accordingly, in the broadest sense, the objects of copying are memes, whereas the objects of translation and interpretation are signs.[clarification needed]
fracchia and lewontin regard memetics as reductionist and inadequate.[25]
[edit]potential lack of philosophical depth
in his chapter titled "truth" published in the encyclopedia of phenomenology, dieter lohmar questions the memeticists' reduction of the highly complex body of ideas (such as religion, politics, war, justice, and science itself) to a putatively one-dimensional series of memes. he sees memes as an abstraction and such a reduction as failing to produce greater understanding of those ideas. the highly interconnected, multi-layering of ideas resists memetic simplification to an atomic or molecular form; as does the fact that each of our lives remains fully enmeshed and involved in such "memes". lohmar argues that one cannot view memes through a microscope in the way one can detect genes. the leveling-off of all such interesting "memes" down to some neutralized molecular "substance" such as "meme-substance" introduces a bias toward scientism and abandons the very essence of what makes ideas interesting, richly available, and worth studying.[26]
[edit]applications
opinions differ as to how best to apply the concept of memes within a "proper" disciplinary framework. one view sees memes as providing a useful philosophical perspective with which to examine cultural evolution. proponents of this view (such as susan blackmore and daniel dennett) argue that considering cultural developments from a meme's-eye view—as if memes themselves respond to pressure to maximise their own replication and survival—can lead to useful insights and yield valuable predictions into how culture develops over time. others such as bruce edmonds and robert aunger have focused on the need to provide an empirical grounding for memetics to become a useful and respected scientific discipline.[27][28] a third approach, described[by whom?] as "radical memetics", seeks to place memes at the centre of a materialistic theory of mind and of personal identity.[29]
prominent researchers in evolutionary psychology and anthropology, including scott atran, dan sperber, pascal boyer, john tooby and others, argue the possibility of incompatibility between modularity of mind and memetics.[citation needed] in their view, minds structure certain communicable aspects of the ideas produced, and these communicable aspects generally trigger or elicit ideas in other minds through inference (to relatively rich structures generated from often low-fidelity input) and not high-fidelity replication or imitation. atran discusses communication involving religious beliefs as a case in point. in one set of experiments he asked religious people to write down on a piece of paper the meanings of the ten commandments. despite the subjects' own expectations of consensus, interpretations of the commandments showed wide ranges of variation, with little evidence of consensus. in another experiment, subjects with autism and subjects without autism interpreted ideological and religious sayings (for example, "let a thousand flowers bloom" or "to everything there is a season"). people with autism showed a significant tendency to closely paraphrase and repeat content from the original statement (for example: "don't cut flowers before they bloom"). controls tended to infer a wider range of cultural meanings with little replicated content (for example: "go with the flow" or "everyone should have equal opportunity"). only the subjects with autism—who lack the degree of inferential capacity normally associated with aspects of theory of mind—came close to functioning as "meme machines".[30]
in his book the robot's rebellion, stanovich uses the memes and memeplex concepts to describe a program of cognitive reform that he refers to as a "rebellion". specifically, stanovich argues that the use of memes as a descriptor for cultural units is beneficial because it serves to emphasize transmission and acquisition properties that parallel the study of epidemiology. these properties make salient the sometimes parasitic nature of acquired memes, and as a result individuals should be motivated to reflectively acquire memes using what he calls a "neurathian bootstrap" process.[31]
[edit]religion

see also: evolutionary psychology of religion
although social scientists such as max weber sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute, richard dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow.
as an enthusiastic darwinian, i have been dissatisfied with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behaviour. they have tried to look for 'biological advantages' in various attributes of human civilization. for instance, tribal religion has been seen as a mechanism for solidifying group identity, valuable for a pack-hunting species whose individuals rely on cooperation to catch large and fast prey. frequently the evolutionary preconception in terms of which such theories are framed is implicitly group-selectionist, but it is possible to rephrase the theories in terms of orthodox gene selection.
—richard dawkins, the selfish gene
he argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. these replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[6]
in her book the meme machine, susan blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes. many of the features common to the most widely practiced religions provide built-in advantages in an evolutionary context, she writes. for example, religions that preach of the value of faith over evidence from everyday experience or reason inoculate societies against many of the most basic tools people commonly use to evaluate their ideas. by linking altruism with religious affiliation, religious memes can proliferate more quickly because people perceive that they can reap societal as well as personal rewards. the longevity of religious memes improves with their documentation in revered religious texts.[12]
aaron lynch attributed the robustness of religious memes in human culture to the fact that such memes incorporate multiple modes of meme transmission. religious memes pass down the generations from parent to child and across a single generation through the meme-exchange of proselytism. most people will hold the religion taught them by their parents throughout their life. many religions feature adversarial elements, punishing apostasy, for instance, or demonizing infidels. in thought contagion lynch identifies the memes of transmission in christianity as especially powerful in scope. believers view the conversion of non-believers both as a religious duty and as an act of altruism. the promise of heaven to believers and threat of hell to non-believers provide a strong incentive for members to retain their belief. lynch asserts that belief in the crucifixion of jesus in christianity amplifies each of its other replication advantages through the indebtedness believers have to their savior for sacrifice on the cross. the image of the crucifixion recurs in religious sacraments, and the proliferation of symbols of the cross in homes and churches potently reinforces the wide array of christian memes.[15]
[edit]memetic explanations of racism

in cultural software: a theory of ideology, jack balkin argued that memetic processes can explain many of the most familiar features of ideological thought. his theory of "cultural software" maintained that memes form narratives, networks of cultural associations, metaphoric and metonymic models, and a variety of different mental structures. balkin maintains that the same structures used to generate ideas about free speech or free markets also serve to generate racist beliefs. to balkin, whether memes become harmful or maladaptive depends on the environmental context in which they exist rather than in any special source or manner to their origination. balkin describes racist beliefs as "fantasy" memes that become harmful or unjust "ideologies" when diverse peoples come together, as through trade or competition.[32]
[edit]internet culture

memes as discrete units

richard dawkins initially defined meme as a noun that "conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of imitation".[6] john s. wilkins retained the notion of meme as a kernel of cultural imitation while emphasizing the meme's evolutionary aspect, defining the meme as "the least unit of sociocultural information relative to a selection process that has favourable or unfavourable selection bias that exceeds its endogenous tendency to change."[16] the meme as a unit provides a convenient means of discussing "a piece of thought copied from person to person", regardless if that thought contains others inside it, or forms part of a larger meme. a meme could consist of a single word, or a meme could consist of the entire speech in which that word first occurred. this forms an analogy to the idea of a gene as a single unit of self-replicating information found on the self-replicating chromosome.
while the identification of memes as "units" conveys their nature to replicate as discrete, indivisible entities, it does not imply that thoughts somehow become quantized or that "atomic" ideas exist that cannot be dissected into smaller pieces. a meme has no given size. susan blackmore writes that melodies from beethoven's symphonies are commonly used to illustrate the difficulty involved in delimiting memes as discrete units. she notes that while the first four notes of beethoven's fifth symphony ( listen (help·info)) form a meme widely replicated as an independent unit, one can regard the entire symphony as a single meme as well.[12]
some critics[who?] have seen the inability to pin an idea or cultural feature to its key units as an insurmountable problem for memetics. blackmore meets such criticism by stating that memes compare with genes in this respect: that while a gene has no particular size, nor can we ascribe every phenotypic feature directly to a particular gene, it has value because it encapsulates that key unit of inherited expression subject to evolutionary pressures. to illustrate, she notes evolution selects for the gene for features such as eye color; it does not select for the individual nucleotide in a strand of dna. memes play a comparable role in understanding the evolution of imitated behaviors.[12]
the 1981 book genes, mind, and culture: the coevolutionary process by charles j. lumsden and e. o. wilson proposed the theory that genes and culture co-evolve, and that the fundamental biological units of culture must correspond to neuronal networks that function as nodes of semantic memory. they coined their own term, "culturgen", which did not catch on. coauthor wilson later acknowledged the term meme as the best label for the fundamental unit of cultural inheritance in his 1998 book consilience: the unity of knowledge, which elaborates upon the fundamental role of memes in unifying the natural and social sciences.[17]
[edit]evolutionary influences on memes

richard dawkins noted the three conditions that must exist for evolution to occur:[18]
variation, or the introduction of new change to existing elements;
heredity or replication, or the capacity to create copies of elements;
differential "fitness", or the opportunity for one element to be more or less suited to the environment than another.
dawkins emphasizes that the process of evolution naturally occurs whenever these conditions co-exist, and that evolution does not apply only to organic elements such as genes. he regards memes as also having the properties necessary for evolution, and thus sees meme evolution as not simply analogous to genetic evolution, but as a real phenomenon subject to the laws of natural selection. dawkins noted that as various ideas pass from one generation to the next, they may either enhance or detract from the survival of the people who obtain those ideas, or influence the survival of the ideas themselves. for example, a certain culture may develop unique designs and methods of tool-making that give it a competitive advantage over another culture. each tool-design thus acts somewhat similarly to a biological gene in that some populations have it and others do not, and the meme's function directly affects the presence of the design in future generations. in keeping with the thesis that in evolution one can regard organisms simply as suitable "hosts" for reproducing genes, dawkins argues that one can view people as "hosts" for replicating memes. consequently, a successful meme may or may not need to provide any benefit to its host.[18]
unlike genetic evolution, memetic evolution can show both darwinian and lamarckian traits. cultural memes will have the characteristic of lamarckian inheritance when a host aspires to replicate the given meme through inference rather than by exactly copying it. take for example the case of the transmission of a simple skill such as hammering a nail, a skill that a learner imitates from watching a demonstration without necessarily imitating every discrete movement modeled by the teacher in the demonstration, stroke for stroke.[19] susan blackmore distinguishes the difference between the two modes of inheritance in the evolution of memes, characterizing the darwinian mode as "copying the instructions" and the lamarckian as "copying the product."[12]
clusters of memes, or memeplexes (also known as meme complexes or as memecomplexes), such as cultural or political doctrines and systems, may also play a part in the acceptance of new memes. memeplexes comprise groups of memes that replicate together and coadapt.[12] memes that fit within a successful memeplex may gain acceptance by "piggybacking" on the success of the memeplex. as an example, john d. gottsch discusses the transmission, mutation and selection of religious memeplexes and the theistic memes contained.[20] theistic memes discussed include the "prohibition of aberrant sexual practices such as incest, adultery, homosexuality, bestiality, castration, and religious prostitution", which may have increased vertical transmission of the parent religious memeplex. similar memes are thereby included in the majority of religious memeplexes, and harden over time; they become an "inviolable canon" or set of dogmas, eventually finding their way into secular law. this could also be referred to as the propagation of a taboo.
[edit]memetics

main article: memetics
the discipline of memetics, which dates from the mid 1980s, provides an approach to evolutionary models of cultural information transfer based on the concept of the meme. memeticists have proposed that just as memes function analogously to genes, memetics functions analogously to genetics. memetics attempts to apply conventional scientific methods (such as those used in population genetics and epidemiology) to explain existing patterns and transmission of cultural ideas.
principal criticisms of memetics include the claim that memetics ignores established advances in other fields of cultural study, such as sociology, cultural anthropology, cognitive psychology, and social psychology. questions remain whether or not the meme concept counts as a validly disprovable scientific theory. this view regards memetics as a theory in its infancy: a protoscience to proponents, or a pseudoscience to some detractors.